Strange olsrd behaviour running on 2 FreeBSD vms

So, the same code, same exec file, same config file for both vms running IPv6 mode; I used scp to be sure I have the same thing on both.
No packetloss script used, so I get more routes for one destination.
The output for the first one (used the most for testing):

Nothing wrong so far, but the netstat -rn output looks like this:

Internet6:
Destination                       Gateway                       Flags      Netif Expire
::1                                      ::1                                 UH          lo0
fd00::/8                             link#1                           U             re0
fd00::3                              link#1                           UHS        lo0
fe80::%lo0/64                   link#4                           U             lo0
fe80::1%lo0                      link#4                           UHS        lo0
ff01:1::/32                        fd00::3                           U             re0
ff01:4::/32                        fe80::1%lo0                   U             lo0
ff02::%re0/32                   fd00::3                          U             re0
ff02::%lo0/32                   fe80::1%lo0                   U            lo0

re0 is the interface on which olsrd runs.
No IPv6 route added to the kernel routing table.

The output for the second vm:

The output for netstat -rn for this vm is:

Internet6:
Destination                       Gateway                       Flags      Netif Expire
::/96                                    ::1                                 UGRS        lo0
::1                                       ::1                                 UH            lo0
::ffff:0.0.0.0/96                   ::1                                 UGRS        lo0
fd00::/8                              link#1                           U               re0
fd00::1/0                            fe80::1%re0                  U               re0
fd00::2/0                            fe80::2%re0                  U               re0
fd00::3/0                            fe80::3%re0                  U               re0
fd00::4                               link#1                           UHS          lo0
fe80::/10                            ::1                                 UGRS         lo0
fe80::%re0/64                    link#1                          U                re0
fe80::201:ff:fe00:4%re0     link#1                          UHS          lo0
fe80::%re1/64                    link#2                          U                re1
fe80::201:ff:fe00:d%re1     link#2                          UHS          lo0
fe80::%lo0/64                     link#4                          U               lo0
fe80::1%lo0                        link#4                          UHS          lo0
ff01:1::/32                        fe80::201:ff:fe00:4%re0   U             re0
ff01:2::/32                        fe80::201:ff:fe00:d%re1   U             re1
ff01:4::/32                         ::1                                  U              lo0
ff02::/16                            ::1                                  UGRS       lo0
ff02::%re0/32                  fe80::201:ff:fe00:4%re0    U            re0
ff02::%re1/32                  fe80::201:ff:fe00:d%re1    U            re1
ff02::%lo0/32                    ::1                                  U              lo0

So, you can see the output is very different, this one is better, but not the best.